Introduction
Safeguarding is the action which helps promote the welfare of people and prevents them from any harm and danger. It is important for care providers is to protect the old age people health and serve them extra care which assist in improving their wellbeing in a better manner. The essay is focused on discussing the scenario in which Doris face arthritis disease and due to this, she cannot trust anyone. The main purpose of this essay is to two safeguarding intervention that can be used for empowering and review how such interventions would work with this person. In addition to this, describes the safeguarding intervention and justify the reason behind using safeguarding intervention that is accurate for the legislation, evidence and guidance.
1. Describe the safeguarding intervention.
Key Safeguarding interventions are the interventions of the manual physical restraints which are used in crisis for the protection of the individuals from harming themselves or from harming others or intervention by the enforcement of the law. The safeguarding interventions are highly useful in the caregiving prospects of the elders who are not able to take care of themselves. Making safeguarding personal is the key safeguarding intervention which is a sector-led initiative as it aims for the development of the results which are attained by the safeguarding work. This intervention also works for the support of people using the various ranges of responses for the improvement and resolving of their circumstances (Crow, et. al., 2018).
The making safeguarding personal has support for the tools which is used in the measuring effectiveness and improving or enhancing the safeguarding the practice for the availability. Making safeguarding personal can be developed using the personalised outcomes of the people who are being provided with the care and support for the daily requirements or who may have been abused as strategically goal and key operational. The making safeguarding personal can be developed using broader participation strategies for providing care services. The focus on the qualitative reporting on the results along with the measures of the quantitative measures will help in the development of making safeguarding personal for providing the care services. Advocacy can also be used as a development factor for the MSP (Graham, et. al., 2016). The person’s centred approaches need to be applied for the working strategies and risks are analysed in the whole situation for the care giving services to the older people who are not stable enough to do the caring things on their own. The making safeguarding personal is the important key safeguarding intervention which is used for the safeguarding practices for the elders to provide the care services in case they will harm themselves or harms others following the law of enforcement. The key safeguarding interventions are important for providing the best services for older people.
Positive risk-taking is another kind of key safeguarding interventions which is involved in the consideration of the situations in which the possibilities of what could go wrong or what should be done for the client in which the family and the carer can have the confidence that the risk is worth a shot. The positive risk-taking is most advantageous for the situations of the patient who are being provided with the care services. The positive risk-taking is the risks in which the situation for the things to get wrong are minimum that is why it is called the positive risk-taking in the care services which will be providing the risk of the health and the chances are of the positive outcomes (Lawson, 2017). The positive risk-taking is being considered as the decisions being made based on the variety of choices available for the support and the availability of the adequate and accurate information about the situations and the actions which are being prepared to be taken. Positive risk-taking is an important key safeguarding intervention as the positive risk is the process which is initiated with the finding of the potential harms and benefits.
The results of the positive risk-taking are to achieve personal changes or growth to encourage and support the people who are taking the risk for health. The risk-taking increases the people’s choice and controlling power in their lives which is managed by the key safeguarding interventions. The positive risk-taking is very important as they are the key safeguarding interventions which are considered for the supporting individuals for taking the positive risks as the personal dignity, protection from the abuse and neglecting of the risks factors. The positive risk-taking is very useful for the deciding of the factors or actions which are in need to be taken as the help for the client in the care giving services. The positive risk-taking is the key safeguarding interventions which are being imported for the results in the care giving for the patients to protect them from any kind of harm as the process of the safeguarding. This is the best situation of the positive risk-taking opportunities for the whole care giving services.
2. Justify the reason for using the safeguarding intervention drawing relevant legislation, guidance and evidence
Safeguarding intervention is the mutual physical restraints used in a crisis. The usage of safeguarding intervenes which can protect and prevent an individual. There is two safeguarding intervention which includes making safeguarding personal and adult family group conferences. Making Safeguarding Personal (MSP) is the sector-led initiative that main purpose is to formulate and develop a result which concentrates to safeguarding the whole work properly. Along with this, the range of responses to help the people in improving and resolving their circumstances. The main reason for selecting this intervention is that this will assist in maintaining and managing the situation in a better way. The making safeguarding personal is not very simple regarding acquiring person consent, although it must be examined individual’s opinions about why they want to do and what they expected as an outcome. MSP positioned firmly within the Department of Health (DH) care and support guidance which is revised in 2017 and it helps in implementing the Care Act 2014 (Lewis, et. al., 2017). It is important for the government is to focus on maintaining such act and support in properly achieving desired results. It is analysed that the main aim of safeguarding is to protect people from any harmful situations and also reduces the risk of abusing with care and support requirements.
The Care Act 2014 applied in this safeguarding intervention which is set out the clear legal framework for how the local government and other section of the system need to prevent old people from any risk and problematic circumstances. It is examined that it leads to a multi-agency of local adults and older individuals of safeguarding system which desires to protect the abuse and neglected conditions. Making safeguarding personal is important for advocacy industry as it helps in performing best practice in safeguarding people, supporting to put the statutory responsibilities into practices which include Human Rights Adults (1998), the Mentality Capacity Act 2005 and Care Act 2014 (Preston-Shoot, et. al., 2015). Such resources provide help to safeguarding in society older people for enhanced engagement in safeguarding people who need to safeguarding support in a better manner. It must focus on assisting the voluntary industry and users group in the society to consider how they can more effective partner in the work of safeguarding. It is the main role of people who will work in Health and social care to perform work in a better way which will support to care for the patients. It means to provide good quality care and assist individual to care everything and authorize to control and manage their facilities.
Positive risk-taking helps an individual in taking positive risks and issues in their lives which is not about motivating them to achieve good goals. This does not remove and reduces the requirement for safeguarding and duty of care which support providers should work with. It assists in identifying and recognising the risk that is related to given activity and then assessing how such activity can be done properly. The main reason for choosing this positive risk-taking as it is such procedure which begins with recognises the desired benefits and importance or harms that arising when care providers deliver care to the Doris (Rhind, et. al., 2015). The potential results help in motivating and help people with a positive risk to take advantages of changing personal and growth. It is that safeguarding intervention which helps in focus on identifying risk and deal with maintaining issues which occurs due to the negative occurrence. Along with this, it helps in managing risk to maximise the people choice and properly control their lives. The risk is important to analyse by safeguarding officer which can minimise and reduces the issues. It is examined that positive risk-taking is that method which mainly concentrates on what people can do and not only limited. This safeguarding intervention involves how to perform great work and focus on maintaining risk in a better way. Besides this, they need to focus on dealing and handling risk which may create a negative impact on the legal framework and guidance. It is required for care providers are to focus on identifying risk that is important to be recognised in a better manner.
3. Apply the safeguarding intervention to the scenario
The making safeguarding personal will be used in the given scenario as it applies to the situation of Doris who is 83 years old. Doris is getting forgetful due to her age which is making her vulnerable for herself and other people such as her daughter jenny, his neighbour Jim and her carer precious who are close to Doris in her situation. The making safeguarding personal intervention will be helpful for the conditions of Doris as she can harm herself or any other person close to her. The making safeguarding personal will analyse the situation to act in the conditions which will help Doris in controlling her emotions over the time along with the help of the caregiver who will take control over the situation to handle the conditions (Rogowski, 2015). As per the scenario, making safeguarding personal will help Doris in getting stable for the household chores and the grocery shopping which will be beneficial for Doris to be looking after her and keep her company which is not given by her daughter due to her hectic schedule of working. Doris is given with the care services by precious but Doris is getting suspicious of her for stealing and fired her from work. This shows the vulnerability of Doris towards the people which is required for the healing and this can be easily done with the help of making safeguarding personal which is manual strategically approach for helping the care service users like Doris with the vulnerability and other things. The making safeguarding personal is very useful in the given scenario as Doris is getting agitated on small things which are very annoying for the caregiver and family people which are close to her as this will provide with the help from the safeguarding convention (Scourfield, et. al., 2015). The safeguarding interventions of the making safeguarding personal will help Doris is getting less vulnerable friends for the dealing with the situations in which Doris is getting agitated will help the carer in developing the strategies for the conditions. Doris will improve her situation with the help of making safeguarding personal.
The positive risk-taking is the other kind of key safeguarding intervention which will help in the risk-taking for Doris in which the risk like providing the treatment for the increasing confusion which will help Doris in getting a better perception of the other people and the caregiver precious. Doris will not assume her of stealing her money in these conditions. The positive risk-taking will provide for the chances for Doris to develop and strengthen her mental conditions due to which she has become vulnerable to the external world. The therapy for the arthritis is a positive risk which is worth to be taken (Shenoy, et. al., 2017). In this positive risk-taking initiative, the benefits and advantages will be provided to Doris as the risk is worth taking for the health profits and the surroundings of Doris. The positive risk-taking will enhance the power in the knees of Doris as she is suffering from arthritis. The therapy or psychologist can help Doris in getting her conditions better for helping her in cooperating with her daughter, neighbour and her carer who is working for providing the best conditions for Doris. The positive risk-taking will help in the given scenario as she will be provided with the best possible help which can be risky but mostly the effectiveness and attentiveness will be positive for the given aspect of the conditions which are being faced by the situations.
The positive risk-taking is very important for the given scenario in which Doris can be assisted according to the safeguarding interventions which will provide the best possible help to the conditions of Doris. The positive risk-taking will be taken by the carer with the combined assurance of the family about the risk will be taken. This will be helpful in the given scenario where the conditions of Doris need to be stabilised with the help of some therapy or medication which is a positive risk for the health conditions of Doris as she can take small medicines easily. The positive risk-taking is important as it will provide for the changes which are easy to implement and also can have vast and differentiating results on the health conditions of Doris which are getting underwire due to her increasing age and increasing confusion in her mind (Stevens, et. al., 2017). The positive risks taking will provide for the attention and advantages to cope with the surroundings of the environment near her which will help in the enhancement of the conditions.
Conclusion
Based on the above-described essay, it is concluded that safeguarding is the process and method which helps in protecting people’s right to live along with security, free from abuse and neglects. This is also important that old people like Doris need to aware of this situation and also understand the available support. As per the scenario, Doris is being rude with the care workers and she needs to understand that the care provider is here to help her in such condition. It is also focused that older people mainly focus on small things if such things do not do in their way then they would be upset and angry like this case.
References
Crow, A. and Watson, L., 2018. Safeguarding in practice. In Advanced Work-based Practice in the Early Years: A Guide for Students (pp. 72-87). Routledge.
Graham, K., Norrie, C., Stevens, M., Moriarty, J., Manthorpe, J. and Hussein, S., 2016. Models of adult safeguarding in England: a review of the literature. Journal of Social Work, 16(1), pp.22-46.
Lawson, J., 2017. The making safeguarding personal approach to practice. Safeguarding Adults Under the Care Act: Understanding Good Practice, London, Jessica Kingsley Publications, pp.20-39.
Lewis, N.V., Larkins, C., Stanley, N., Szilassy, E., Turner, W., Drinkwater, J. and Feder, G.S., 2017. Training on domestic violence and child safeguarding in general practice: a mixed method evaluation of a pilot intervention. BMC family practice, 18(1), pp.1-13.
Preston-Shoot, M., Cooper, A., Penhale, B., Timson, J., Storer, T. and Foylan, L., 2015. Rochdale adult care: working towards outcome focussed safeguarding practice. The Journal of Adult Protection.
Rhind, D., McDermott, J., Lambert, E. and Koleva, I., 2015. A review of safeguarding cases in sport. Child Abuse Review, 24(6), pp.418-426.
Rogowski, S., 2015. From child welfare to child protection/safeguarding: A critical practitioner’s view of changing conceptions, policies and practice. Practice, 27(2), pp.97-112.
Scourfield, J., Smail, P. and Butler, D., 2015. A systemic approach to improving the engagement of fathers in child safeguarding. Child Abuse Review, 24(2), pp.129-139.
Shenoy, A. and Appel, J.M., 2017. Safeguarding confidentiality in electronic health records. Cambridge Q. Healthcare Ethics, 26, p.337.
Stevens, M., Martineau, S., Norrie, C. and Manthorpe, J., 2017. Helping or hindering in adult safeguarding: an investigation of practice. London, Social Care Workforce Research Unit, King’s College London, available online at https://www. kcl. ac. uk/sspp/policy-institute/scwru/pubs/2017/reports/Helping-or-Hindering-Final-Report-2017. pdf (accessed 25 May 2018).
Wyllie, E. and Batley, K., 2019. Skills for safe practice–a qualitative study to evaluate the use of simulation in safeguarding children teaching for pre-registration children’s nurses. Nurse education in practice, 34, pp.85-89.